Saturday, November 19, 2005

The Internet is for . . . Bush Bashing?

Last weekend, in an attempt to entertain my younger brother, I started looking for the rumored, um, adult site that can be accessed by typing whitehouse.com or .org or .something. (I do feel the need to justify my actions and explain that it's not as though we intended to look at pictures or anything. I just merely wanted to see if it existed as stated.) Needless to say, we did not stumble upon the supposed site. We did come across some fairly interesting findings. We especially enjoyed the kids' letters to the president. We are suckers for anything bearing the phrase "tee hee" because it reminds us of the good ole days, when I used to encourage Brett to run around the house, flicking his wrist and squealing like a southern school gal when he was around 5 or maybe 10 years old. I bet my father would consider permitting my mother to get a new kitten (we fear she is two steps away from becoming a crazy cat lady at such a young age) if she promised to name it President Bush.

Anyway, I found what I read of the site to be rather humorous. I'm all for satire, parody, smart, and even not so smart humor. When we filled my card-carrying conservative father in about what we were looking at, he muttered something about disgusting filth. I attempted to briefly explain satire's place in society and the canon through Swift's "A Modest Proposal," but he would have none of it. I quickly realized that republicans probably don't sympathize too much with the poor Irish folks who are all already dead, so I kind of gave up.

In terms of politics, when prompted, I will sometimes claim to be the most moderate person you've ever met. (Of late, this title that I have bestowed upon myself is becoming increasingly inaccurate.) I am a registered independent and have no intentions of declaring a party alliance anytime soon. I don't really care that much about money matters (beyond having enough of my own to support myself), I can't imagine living long enough to collect social security (though I do wish the elderly were currently being better supported), and I can (sometimes, though it is becoming increasingly difficult) see both sides of the war. I think most effective politicians are showy smooth-talkers and I don't think liars are cool, so I remain a bit put off by politics in general. I tend to let factors like candidates' backgrounds, looks, families, and speech-delivering abilities mildly affect my decision about whom to support. I refused to vote for Kerry because he gives off a skeevy vibe and his wife seems like a nasty lady, though I didn't mind John Edwards because he is kinda cute and has a dead son. (And yes, with that statement, I acknowledge that I am probably invalidating any point I am trying to make, if indeed I even have one, with my admission of ridiculous and thoughtless decisions. Such is life.) As far as republicans go, I enjoy John McCain because he seems to be a middle of the liner, plus he's a cute old guy who was a POW in Vietnam.

Admittedly, I have refrained from becoming especially invested or well-versed in a lot of the issues. Those more aggressively involved in politics may fault me for taking the easy way out and refusing to take sides more often than not. That's fine. I can take it. I can admit it, even. I think our society still, albeit more subtly, dictates that girls shouldn't necessarily hold strong opinions. "Nice" girls don't discuss politics and religion, right? Anyway, I have no intentions of launching into a lengthy feminist diatribe. I do believe that, at first, my moderate views resulted from my desire to be utterly inoffensive and universally accepted. During the latter part of my teenage years and the very early part of my early adulthood, I transformed from a loud, vivacious, and, at times, slightly obnoxious girl to a mumbling someone who constantly played with her hair and could barely make eye contact or speak without covering her mouth with her hand. This change in demeanor was also accompanied by a complete disinterest in expressing or even holding any strong opinions about much of anything.

Now that I'm old and wise and no longer consumed by such an insane degree of self-consciousness, I try to retain my moderate status for more empowering reasons. I like refusing to allow a group of people to attempt to dictate my beliefs regarding a particular issue. I like considering both sides, weighing the positives and negatives and sometimes refusing to pick the lesser of two evils. I like disliking both President Bush and Michael Moore. I recognize that this is overly simplistic and that many people do not blindly follow party lines, but many do.

At the same time, I may be becoming a bit radical. My father would love to be BFF with GWB and my younger sister is in a conservative cult at Penn State. (No matter how much I disagree with her political beliefs, I can give her props for figuring out what they are and rolling with it.) The tv in my parents' room is left on Fox News for approximately 19 hours each day. Needless to say, for entertainment purposes, someone has to play devil's advocate and get everyone worked up every once in a while. (And, yes, I have few friends/no life.) Most recently, we have been going at it about gay rights and abortion, because I seem to get most riled up about those two topics. I won't go into the conversations, but we never get anywhere. I will say that choosing to have an abortion, in my opinion, is a very personal, complicated, and potentially haunting decision. I believe that, ultimately, beyond the messy debates over when life begins and who's killing whom, denying women this right will set our gender back about 40 years. At the same time, I can respect the opinions of others, especially concerning such a touchy and emotional issue that is often deep rooted in people's beliefs. I do tend to get a bit fiery in the comfort of my own home, though.

So the other night, some anti-abortion group called our house and spoke with my mother. My first reaction was, "what kind of mailing/calling lists did my father put us on?," which was quickly followed by, "oh, she should have let me talk to them." They called back a few days later, and I regretfully did not answer the phone. Apparently, they were calling regarding the $30.00 pledge my mother made during their previous conversation. Ooooh. So not cool. She claims she just made it to get them to shut up and had no intentions of paying them. (Of course, providing a perfect example of an adherence to the rule that women should play nice rather than risk offending someone with what they truly think.) This morning, my father started talking about how some man named Sam will hopefully be the newest Supreme Court Justice and stick it to Row v. Wade. I gave him my standard, "Well, then I'll be moving to D.C. to protest in an 'I Heart my Vagina' tee," response. Then, I explained if the crazies call back and I happen to answer the phone, I will respond with, "I think you have the wrong house. This is what we do for fun here," and immediately start singing, "kill the babies" to the tune of "Oh My Darling, Clementine." And, yes, I sang it out. My father was far from impressed. Maybe I should have changed the lyrics to "terminate the pregnancies," but there are too many syllables and I've never been one to speak in euphamisms. My brother and I were amused (it doesn't take much), though I worry that the little ditty may have been a "had to be there" moment that comes off as harsh, less than articulate, and one-sided on paper (well, computer screen). For the record, I actually enjoy babies and do not promote the killing of anything. (I was even a tiny bit saddened when I was forced to squash a spider to spare a coworker's sanity the other day. She ran away from her desk, screaming, "Sara, if you don't want to be working by yourself today, you need to kill that thing." Poor little dude.) Ultimately, I had a strong reaction based on a firm belief, and for that, I will remain unapologetic.

5 comments:

Anonymous said...

Having anti-abortion groups call your house makes it sound like you are in a pretty intensely conservative family.

On the abortion note, IF Roe V Wade was overturned it would send the decision back to the individual states to decide. Most states except a handful like California and New York would probably impose a few more restrictions without outlawing them altogether. Some of the more bible-toting states may outlaw them.

There are several possible effects of this including that women won't seek professional medical help and will start ending pregnancies on their own (this is bad). Despite Mifepristone not being available over-the-counter yet due being blocked by conservatives in the FDA, there is still a drug combination available over-the-counter than will end a pregnancy. The other option would be simply crossing state lines to somewhere that allows it or has less stringent rules.

In my opinion, abortion opponents have lost the battle already. No matter what they do, individual women will always have the choice of whether or not to end their pregnancies. If they really want to lower the number of fetuses being aborted; maybe they should drop their abstinence-only teachings in school and focus more on a Safe-Sex policy that will actually help reduce things like unwanted pregancy and STIs.

Being from the south, all of the schools here teach pure abstinence. When I was in highschool I remember being amused at the message they were trying to get across. It was something to the effect of...

"If you have sex you will get pregnant"

"If you have sex you will get HIV"

"The only way not to get pregnant or contract HIV is by not having sex until marriage."

In all seriousness, abstinence really is a joke. Surveys of highschool-aged teenagers have repeatedly found that a very high percentage of them have sex. Telling them not to is just like telling them not to smoke, or drink alcohol, it just does not work. And because they aren't given any knowledge of things like condoms, hormonal birth control, ect; they are put at risk of having the very problems that people want to avoid. I personally know a couple of girls that I went to highschool with who indeed got pregnant accidentally.

Anyway I think I've strayed from the topic enough now. I'm sure you will live long enough to at least get your AARP benefits. :-)

Gabe Thexton said...

I believe there's life at conception, we'll leave it at that, I'm not changing your mind and you're not changing mine.

What is the HIV rate of married couples who abstained before marrying (excluding accidental infections and born-withs)? Thought so.

And that porn site used to be there, somebody must have paid a load of cash to buy it from them.

Anonymous said...

I can't believe that you called YAF a cult. I've explained to you multiple times that YAF-Young Americans for Freedom, is a conservative activism club. We simply try to spread the conservative message across college campuses. You know, present the other side of the story. You said you wanted to be able to look at both sides, so don't shut this one out. Besides, on a place like collge campuses where the vast majority of issues are taught with a liberal slant, there is a prevalant need for clubs such as YAF. So stop telling everyone one I'm in a cult, it sounds bad and makes people look at me funny. P.S. sorry about any spelling or gramatical errors, I know you to well, you'll find them all.

Anonymous said...

Ahem. Go to google. Type in "failure" and click, "i'm feeling lucky."

~Steph

Sara said...

That's awesome, Steph!